Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing...

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:50:33AM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:

> For 5.0, I maybe the black sheep in saying this, but I'd like to see
> /bin/csh be the real thing for 5.0.  By all means, leave tcsh in
> /bin, but for the sake of backwards compatability, IMHO `ln
> /bin/tcsh /bin/csh` was a bad idea.

Frankly, this isn't going to happen.  We went through all this months
ago: please just accept the will of the community and drop the matter.

Kris

PGP signature