In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes:
>On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
>> lian Elischer writes:
>>
>>> the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty.
>>
>> There is support for subdirectories:
>>
>> ls -la /dev/fd
>
>What am I supposed to see there? I get three character devices, all
>mounted on /dev directly.
Uhm, have you forgotten how ls(1) works ?
Try this then:
ls -lad /dev/fd /dev/fd/[012]
>In view of the fact that this thread is about deficiencies in your
>devfs, this is particularly uncalled for. One of the reasons that
>Julian's devfs never got debugged was that you had made it very clear
>from the start that it would be removed.
History being rewritten eh ? I spent 3+ years trying to argue his
DEVFS should be made default!
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
