In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju lian Elischer writes: >the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty. There is support for subdirectories: ls -la /dev/fd >it was a primary design goal in the previous devfs and its >disappearance caught me by surprise. (the support I mean) <SATIRE> The ability to not panic left, right and centre was a primary design goal of this devfs and its absense in the previos devfs caught be by surprise. (The lack of support as well). </SATIRE> Julian, I think it would reflect well on you to stop the official mourning at some point in the near future. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Greg Lehey
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current &&am... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current &&am... Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Julian Elischer
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Michael Lucas
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... John Baldwin
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vi... Michael Lucas
- Re: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current &&am... John Baldwin