On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > DOD/DFAS, as well as DOD/DISA. > > I find it amazing that the CIA has a more lax policy than DFAS and DISA. > The only person I've ever talked to from the CIA was in charge of network security to some degree, and according to him they can't even use FreeBSD, OpenBSD, or NetBSD internally. Everything must come from a central vendor and be supported by a real company, not by mailing lists. I'd call that less lax. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Andrew Boothman
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jim Bryant
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Gordon Tetlow
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jos Backus
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jim Bryant
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jim Bryant
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Joseph Mallett
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Jim Bryant
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Johann Visagie
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Garance A Drosihn
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? David O'Brien
- Re: bash in /usr/local/bin? Doug Ambrisko