On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:08:21PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:01:36AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 04:51:55PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> > > > Thus spake David O'Brien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > >
> > > > Looking at the first two lines, shouldn't it be
> > > >
> > > > > #define SSH_VERSION (ssh_version_get())
> > > > > #define SSH_VERSION_BASE "OpenSSH_2.9"
> > > > > -#define SSH_VERSION_ADDENDUM "[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20010608"
> > > > > +#define SSH_VERSION_ADDENDUM "FreeBSD 20010608"
> > > >
> > > > anyways? :-)
> > >
> > > *sigh* Can we please comment on the content?
> >
> > Sounds like a good idea to change this.
>
> Seeing as it's directed people to the right maintainer because of it, so
> far... It's not "portable" OpenSSH, and it's not "OpenSSH running on
> FreeBSD", so either we need to have a completely new name for it (FreeBSDSSH
> or something), or something that is otherwise descriptive to differentiate
> it. It's far removed from being "plain" OpenSSH or "portable" OpenSSH.
Using the same logic we could e.g. gcc --version report
'gcc version blah [EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Not a good idea. People are supposed
to send-pr a bug to FreeBSD.org and then it is the projects internal
process^Wproblem to assign this PR to the appropriate maintainer(s).
W/
--
| / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
