>...since a lock order reversal means that you can get in a deadlock... Argh, of course. It's only not problematic if it's a uniprocessor and it doesn't take an interrupt at the wrong time. Sorry for being dense, I'm still used to spl() =) Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Lock order reversals that aren't problematic Bill Fenner
- RE: Lock order reversals that aren't problematic John Baldwin
- RE: Lock order reversals that aren't problematic Garrett Wollman
- Re: Lock order reversals that aren't problematic Bosko Milekic
- RE: Lock order reversals that aren't problematic John Baldwin
- Bill Fenner