John Baldwin wrote: > >#3 struct upctx (upcall-context), virtcpu, thrdslot (thread slot) > >#4 struct lwp (decided) > > > > usually the 'lwp' will be passed around so diffs to NetBSD will be > > minimalised. > > One thing to note is that as Vahalia (sp?) points out, lwp > on SVR4 and Solaris is actually #3 (a virtual CPU) where as > lwp on SunOS is a user-thread. Unfortunately, I think by > using overloaded terms you are going to confuse people who > come into the project from different backgrounds. I would > try and stay with non-ambiguous names if possible. Virtual CPUs are a very bad idea. The main reason SVR4 and Solaris threading didn't scale well from day one is the "virtual CPU" approach. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Daniel Eischen
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Peter Jeremy
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Alfred Perlstein
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Daniel Eischen
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Peter Wemm
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. John Baldwin
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Terry Lambert
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. John Baldwin
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Terry Lambert
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. John Baldwin
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. John Baldwin
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Peter Jeremy
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Daniel Eischen
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Julian Elischer
- Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature. Peter Wemm