On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:49:25 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura> said: Alfred> Certain operations, such as: Alfred> kq = (struct kqueue *)fp->f_data; Alfred> should not really require that the file be locked, it's implicitly frozen Alfred> at creation time (i think) Seigo> Yes. Only one exception beats off everything. union_dircheck() in fs/unionfs/union_subr.c may replace f_data with a new vnode. -- Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigi... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigi... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigi... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigi... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigi... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigi... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigi... Seigo Tanimura
- Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and... Alfred Perlstein