> On Wed, 16 May 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > : FWIW, my gross hack to usr.sbin/kbdcontrol also worked:
> >
> > I tend to dislike adding ../../sys to the includes list since they
> > might not be compatible with the host's sys files used to build libc.
>
> I'd like to remove all the existing ones. They are a hack to handle
> the case where you haven't bootstrapped properly. They intentionally
> give <sys> includes which may be incompatible with the host ones, in
> case the host ones are out of date relative to the src tree. This
> depends on only a few headers like <sys/user.h> being out of date,
> and sometimes helps mainly for headers like <sys/user.h> which declare
> system structures that are groped in by userland. But it is just a
> bug in general.
I have -I../../sys in src/usr.sbin/digictl/Makefile.
I put it there because the digi ioctl interface header isn't actually
installed anywhere. There's no good reason for this except that I
couldn't think of a good place (/usr/include/sys/digi/ ?). I cribbed
the idea from the vinum(8) build.
How should this be done - and where should I install digiio.h if
that's what's required ?
Cheers.
> Bruce
--
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
