Daniel Eischen writes: > > OK, thanks. Here's my guess at what should be changed for the Linux > emulator. If this looks correct, I'll commit it. > > Hmm, I wonder how linuxthreads works under FreeBSD without this > change... > Well, they've never worked perfectly, by any means. Perhaps this will improve the stability problems people have been reporting with the various linux jdks under FreeBSD/i386. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs Daniel Eischen
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs Bruce Evans
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs Daniel Eischen
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs Bruce Evans
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs Daniel Eischen
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LD... Andrew Gallatin
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LD... Andrew Gallatin
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, an... Daniel Eischen
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals... Andrew Gallatin
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals... Bruce Evans
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals... Daniel Eischen
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals... John Polstra
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals... Daniel Eischen
- Re: Rfork'd threads, signals... John Polstra