If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:06:12PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" writ > es: > > : Hey whatever. Let's just keep a rendered TXT version where it always > > : (ie. in the src/release... cvs) was but keep the originial as a sgml > > : version in the doc tree. > > > > UPDATING will continue to be a flat file, or I will no longer maintain > > it. > > Right ;-) "Form follows function" I thought I responded to Warner's, er, strong statement of his position, earlier, but I'm not sure. So, for the record, I *have* no intention, and never *had* any intention of touching src/UPDATING, changing its format, or even gazing wistfully in its general direction. Bruce.
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Bruce A. Mah
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Wilko Bulte
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Leif Neland
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CUR... Antoine Beaupre (LMC)
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CUR... Wilko Bulte
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5... Bruce A. Mah
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5... Leif Neland
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CUR... Warner Losh
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5... Wilko Bulte
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5... Bruce A. Mah
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CUR... Warner Losh
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Dima Dorfman
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Bruce A. Mah
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Nik Clayton
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Bruce A. Mah
- Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Nik Clayton