the only difference I know of between the 905b and c is wake on lan. I
thought I heard something about a 905c II that had problems with freebsd,
but I don't remember much more.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lars Eggert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Norbert Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: ISO image available?
> Norbert Koch wrote:
> > > The 5.0-20010410-CURRENT installer doesn't recognize my "3Com
3c905C-TX
> > > Fast Etherlink XL", which in 4.2 is handled by the xl driver. I guess
the
> > > netinstall will have to wait...
> >
> > Uh, is there so much difference between 3c905(B|C)-TX? I ask, because
> > I have
> >
> > xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd000-0xd07f
> > mem 0xdd000000-0xdd00007f irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci0
>
> I don't know. :-)
> All I can say is that it is recognized fine under 4.2.
> --
> Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
> http://www.isi.edu/larse/ University of Southern California
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
