On 10-Apr-01 Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen wrote:
> 
> Is it me fsck'ing up, or is fsck(8) lacking behind in the
> dirpref changes?
> 
> 
>   Automatic boot in progress...
>   /dev/da0s1a: BAD SUPER BLOCK: VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN
> FIRST ALTERNATE
>   
>   /dev/da0s1a: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
>   /dev/da0s1a: Automatic file system check failed . . . help!
>   Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: 
>   # fsck_ffs -b 32 /
>   Alternate super block location: 32
>   ** /dev/da0s1a
>   ** Last Mounted on 
>   ** Root file system
>   ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
>   ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
>   ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
>   ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
>   ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
>   FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK
>   SALVAGE? [yn] y
>   
>   2683 files, 136083 used, 399724 free (1164 frags, 49820 blocks, 0.2%
> fragmentation)
>   
>   UPDATE STANDARD SUPERBLOCK? [yn] y

You didn't want to do this.  This is probably why you panic'd.

> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/setup.c.diff?r1=1.8&r2
> =1.9&f=h

Yep, my fsck works again (well, it doesn't blow up at least), will commit it in
a second.

-- 

John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to