Will Andrews wrote: > [ cc's trimmed, moved to -current ] > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > So long as it is not forced unconditionally to be static. > > I agree. > > > b) I've not seen the numbers for this. If it is only 1% faster, it > > doesn't make sense, even though it sounds good on paper. > > I will perform careful benchmarks and publish results. Can people wait > until that is done before moving forward please? Give me until Saturday. Any updates? My quick test involving running pkg_version on a system with 92 installed ports, which is very make-intensive operation if ports have origin recorded, as pkg_version(1) runs `make -V' for each port, shown that statically-compiled make is about 15% faster than dynamically-compiled. Sound like a reasonable speed gain for 100k binary size increase. What do people think? -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
