On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > Most of the pcb actually has the same persistence as the kernel stack > > (both mainly store the process's context while the process is in the > > kernel). But it is silly to put the pcb below the stack instead of > > above it. Perhaps the idea is to get a panic sooner when something > > is corrupted. > > I have never understood why the context is not ON the stack. At least on i386's, it is because the context is not all saved in LIFO order. The pcb gets the non-LIFO stuff. E.g., the FP state is saved lazily, not pushed on every entry to the kernel. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/lock.h Leif Neland
- RE: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/lock.h John Baldwin
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/lock.h Gary Jennejohn
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/lock... Leif Neland
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/... John Baldwin
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: mac... Leif Neland
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff:... John Baldwin
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: mac... Bruce Evans
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff:... Julian Elischer
- Re: make kernel failure: pec... Bruce Evans
- Re: make kernel failure: pec... Julian Elischer
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff:... John Baldwin
- Re: make kernel failure: pec... Bruce Evans
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/... Edwin Culp
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/... Warner Losh
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/lock.h David O'Brien
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/lock.h Warner Losh
- Re: make kernel failure: pecoff: machine/lock.h Warner Losh