In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt Dillon writes: : How about a temporary LD_LIBRARY path to run the tools, pointing into : /usr/obj somewhere? We'd have to copy the current libraries to that location, or at least into /tmp. These are *HOST* binaries after all. And the hacking to do that might be, ummmm, difficult at best. We have an invariant in the system right now that one libX.so.N is binary compatible with all other libX.so.N (or at the very least the new one installed is upwardly compatible with the old one). Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURREN... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURREN... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (wa... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (wa... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Jos Backus
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for ... Alex Zepeda
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad... Daniel Eischen