On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 03:00:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Since this post actually has some content I'm moving it to
> -current.
>
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > I agree. RO / is absoultely *REQUIRED* for our application.
>
> As stated, all concerned are sympathetic to that. This is why it's
> configurable.
Not really -- specifying /var as the home of these files will not work
very well (as you even show why below). So things *appear* to be
configurable, but aren't.
> The good thing about this ridiculous thread is that the next time
> someone asks me if I've read the code, I can simply respond with, "No one
> reads the code for my projects, even when I include the cvsweb links in my
> head's up mail, so why should I be bothered?"
I *did* read the diff you committed. So don't use that on me. ;-)
> Do YOU Yahoo!?
Yep!
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
