On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:59:46PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > The only thing you don't like about mtree is it changing ownership + > > modes, right? > > Not only that. Using mtree(1) creates busloads of unnecessary > directories. But they're harmless. While I agree it is clutter, having to duplicate its work in the Makefile's with lists of dirs to create just seems like a duplication and waste of effort; and even an little NIH as mtree is rather ingrained in BSD. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1... David O'Brien
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: using mtree in our build... David O'Brien
- Re: using mtree in our b... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Bruce Evans
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues wit... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Matt Dillon
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar