Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> <<On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 23:39:07 -0600 (CST), Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Um - compliance with what, exactly?
> IEEE Std.1003.1-1990 et seq.
Since no one has bothered to close this PR with a note that this
noncompliance is unacceptable, I'm assuming that no one considers it
so. Further, it's not clear that FreeBSD can't stay in compliance with
an appropriate note in the compliance document.
There are other places where FreeBSD doesn't comply with the
appropriate standard - packages vs. FHS, for instance. I claim that
the benefits of no longer providing grossly inaccurate error message
outweigh the relatively minor conformance loss in this case. So would
someone commit the thing so that others can share those benefits?
Thanks,
<mike
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
