> >> (i.e., a topological sort). Does `rcorder' call `tsort' or does it > >> reinvent the wheel? > > > UTSL > > You could have simply answered the question. For the benefit of > everyone else: yes, it reinvents the wheel. I personally don't have a problem with this; tsort should be a library routine referenced by both tsort(1) and rcorder(8), of course, but the way tsort(1) works, there is really no easy way to use it to do the job in any reasonable amount of time. As far as wheel reinvention goes, we should add gcc, ld, and make to the list of programs reinventing the tsort wheel... kinda calls out for a library routine; wait, I already said that once... 8-). Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Garrett Rooney
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Bill Vermillion
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Terry Lambert
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Garance A Drosihn
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Garrett Rooney
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Garrett Wollman
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewal... David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewal... Garrett Wollman
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewal... Terry Lambert
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Warner Losh
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard