> I see the opposite. I see that without writing to the /dev/random
> device I get a cons is an object that cares fortune 99+% of the time
> on my first login. With it, I see more decently random fortunes (but
> I haven't done a statistical analysis of them to see how random things
> are).
Is it just me, or have there been more problems achieving
real statistical randomness since /dev/random went in, than
at any other time in BSD history?
I booted a 1.5 system a couple of times for grins.
It gives you a different fortune each time.
Note that 1.5 "lacked" /dev/random.
Perhaps it's time to rename it as /dev/deliberate?
Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message