>> which part looks gratuitous? could you be more specific?
>#ifdef's for FreeBSD.
we don't do this just for FreeBSD. while it is okay to claim that they
should be stripped off on import, i believe you are missing the point.
they are not gratuitous.
>rune_t/_rune_t type recasting
>_COMPAT_RUNE #ifdef's.
>for example.
as far as I understand, they are basically for backward compatibility
with 4.4BSD runelocale code. they are not gratuitous.
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Michael C . Wu
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Johan Granlund
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Michael C . Wu
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Warner Losh
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Motoyuki Konno
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Tatsumi Hosokawa
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Propo... itojun
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and P... Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Jordan Hubbard
- Re: I18N Progress, Plans, and Proposals Michael C . Wu
