Does anyone know if the patch indicated below was committed to fix this FreeBSD 3.2 bug? I can't upgrade to a later release yet, but if this patch is it, I can hack it in. On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * David Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000911 12:19] wrote: > > > > > Yes, there's a problem with procfs in 3.2 when you stress it heavily > > > like that, my suggestion is to get 4-stable running, or at least try > > > to get 3.5.1 up and running, but I'm unsure if it's fixed in 3.5.1. > > > > > > -Alfred > > > > Is this related? : > > > > "Don't call calcru() on a swapped-out process. calcru() access p_stats, > > which is in U-area." > > > > That's from CVSweb at file procfs_status.c, revision 1.14 > > I'm not really a procfs guru, I only know about your reported problem, > I've never heard of that message though. > > -- > -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
