On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > Is this really of practical use today? > > I have a WIP patch which needs to temporarily store something on the > stack and should things go wrong enough it will be accessed by UMA, > which can't handle the fault nor decide to skip the access. > > I can add something like td_pinstack or whatever to keep it around, > but perhaps the entire machinery can be just whacked? p_hold already does that.
- kernel-side thread stack swapping Mateusz Guzik
- Re: kernel-side thread stack swapping Konstantin Belousov
- Re: kernel-side thread stack swapping Mateusz Guzik
- Re: kernel-side thread stack swapping Konstantin Belousov
- Re: kernel-side thread stack swapping Mateusz Guzik