On 21.02.2022 12:43, Toomas Soome wrote:
On 21. Feb 2022, at 19:18, Simon J. Gerraty <s...@juniper.net> wrote:
Toomas Soome <tso...@me.com> wrote:
Why should pxeboot have ZFS support?

Well, the feature X can be helpful for recovery purposes. The root
cause is not the feature X itself, but the size limit. And the
unfortunate fact, the size limit is not fixed, but depends on the
system. Therefore there are two options - either to fix the size limit
or drop option X from default build — at least till the size limit is
fixed (or support for BIOS will be dropped).

Or just build separate variants.
As Bjoern said Lua is probably the straw breaking the cammel's back
but I think it reasonable to assume that a system that has the resources
to support ZFS does not have an ancient BIOS ?

Thus a non-ZFS version could work for older systems
while those without limitation can use the kitchen-sink version.

It is not even about “ancient” BIOS, the problem is, PXE stack does also need 
resources and it is easier to consume low memory (just as loader does).

I've recently switched all my lab systems to UEFI PXE. It "just works" for me using normal loader.efi of 872KB.

--
Alexander Motin

Reply via email to