On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 19:05, David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org> wrote: > [ Disclaimer: I work for Microsoft, but not on WSL and this is my own > opinion ] > (...) > David >
Just as a counterpoint to Rozhuk's take, that all sounds sensible enough to me - FreeBSD would probably gain more from this than MS. So the WSL2 TODO would be something like this: * Ballooning driver. Seems like a proof of concept would be doable enough - could you model it as an unkillable task (userland or kernel) that wants to allocate a lot of memory, and anything it gets it hands back to the host? * Some sort of boot support. Maybe as a shim that chainloads an unmodified kernel? Probably finicky, but also self-contained. * File systems. Is / also 9p-over-HyperV-channels? If so that's kind of crucial and perhaps the hardest part. Oh, and how does the terminal work? You support multiple ttys, so I guess it's not straight emulated serial? -- Daniel _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
