> On Jan 4, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Enji Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2021, at 10:49 AM, Marek Zarychta <zarych...@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl 
>> <mailto:zarych...@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl>> wrote:
> 
> …
> 
>> Terrible idea IMHO, but I am only the weak voice from the userbase.
>> 
>> It's like deprecating old, well-worn hammer in the favour of the nail
>> gun. Why not deprecate biff(1), pom(6), nvi(1) etc.?
> 
> Marek,
>       I’m curious: have you used etcupdate before instead of mergemaster? If 
> so when? If you ran into issues (UX as well as functional): could you please 
> report them on bugs.freebsd.org <http://bugs.freebsd.org/> ?
>       etcupdate is a less fragile tool that’s broken my systems less when 
> compared with mergemaster.

That reminds me, there is a feature gap (in the last 5~10 years I’ve used 
etcupdate) that I forgot about between mergemaster and etcupdate: in 
particular, mergemaster works when adding/removing new users and groups from 
/etc/passwd* and /etc/group, respectively, dealing with mtree files, the last 
time I checked. Apart from that, I don’t see a use for mergemaster (and in 
which case, the feature gap can be trimmed down/migrated to etcupdate). 
mergemaster has broken the configuration of my machines/VMs more than etcupdate 
has ever and I’ve used both tools for about the same time.

Cheers,
-Enji
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to