On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 2:54 PM Felix Kronlage-Dammers <f...@hazardous.org> wrote: > > Alexander Leidinger wrote on 03.10.20 17:37: > > > Quoting Kristof Provost <k...@freebsd.org> (from Sat, 03 Oct 2020 16:06:43 > > +0200): > > >> Okay, let’s abandon that patch. It’s ugly and it doesn’t work. > >> > >> Here’s a different approach that I’m much happier with. > >> https://people.freebsd.org/~kp/0001-bridge-Call-member-interface-ioctl-without-NET_EPOCH.patch > >> > >> > >> It passes the regression tests with WITNESS and INVARIANTS enabled, > >> and a hack in the epair ioctl() handler to make it sleep (to look a > >> bit like the Intel ioctl() handler that currently trips up if_bridge). > > Works for me. > > No crash, no LOR, promisc-mode stays enabled, jails are reachable. > > indeed! I can second that. Works nicely, my machine does not panic > anymore and machines (bhyve vms) behind the bridge are reachable.
I third that, it works great for me! -Dustin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
