In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Jul, Will Andrews wrote:
>
> >> Only if ports-base isn't anymore in ports-all or my local CVS tree is
> >
> > ports-base was/has never [been] in ports-all, for some strange reason.
>
> Really?
[...]
> I read this as: If you didn't use "ports-all", you have to use
> "ports-base". If you use "ports-all", "ports-base" is already included.
You are correct. The ports-all collection includes ports-base, and
that has always been the case.
John
--
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
"Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
