--------
In message <9f03fb79-a0ad-3c11-9a50-bc7731882...@fastmail.com>, Yuri Pankov
writes:
>Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:56+0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I figured it out.
>>>
>>> I used to have MK_CTF=no in src.conf, but I recently changed it to
>>> WITH_CTF=no.
>>
>> It's either WITH_xxx=yes or WITHOUT_xxx=yes.
>
>Or even WITH_xxx= or WITHOUT_xxx=, src.conf(5) explicitly states that
>value is NOT checked:
>
>The values of variables are ignored regardless of their setting; even if
> they would be set to "FALSE" or "NO". The presence of an option
>causes it to be honored by make(1).
That is not even close to POLA-compliance...
Obviously negative values ("false", "no") should either be reported as
errors or preferably be respected.
PS: [This is not the bikeshed you are looking for]
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
