On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 02:14:16PM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote:
> On 21/10/2018 13:31, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:41:46AM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote:
> >> With the host already at r339438,
> >> creation of a jail (method: svn (other methods failed)) resulted in
> >> inferior version r339435.
> >>
> >> Is this normal?
> >>
> >> Re: 
> >> <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-October/071742.html>
> >>  I want the version of the jail to match the version of the host before I 
> >> use poudriere to build kernel modules, and so on.
> >>
> >> ....
> > r339438 is a revision in stable/11.  …
> 
> That's weird, because I recently successfully ran:
> 
> svn switch '^/stable/12' /usr/src
> 
> – prior to a successful update of the system.

Sure.  On my laptop (for example), I have a local private SVN mirror
repo.  It is currently at r339530.

On each of 3 different slices, I have stable/11, stable/12, and
head; the corresponding working directories (which have been updated
since the repo was last updated) are currently at r339446, r339435,
and r339530 (respectively).

FreeBSD's newvers.sh would put "r339530M" in the uname string for
each of those.

My version places "r339446M/339530", "r339435M/339530", and
"r339530M/339530" (respectively) in the uname string to try to help
clarify which revision in each branch last affected that branch.

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill                              da...@catwhisker.org
Women (and decent men): vote against supporters of Trump's misogyny!

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to