On 10/7/18 7:17 AM, Graham Perrin wrote:
According to <https://www.freshports.org/graphics/drm-kmod/#requiredtorun>:
- for drm-kmod, drm-stable-kmod is the sole runtime dependency.
Below, I see -next- (not -stable-):
$ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-kmod
drm-next-kmod
drm-next-kmod
$
– is that contrary to what's at FreshPorts? (Do I misunderstand something?)
----
More:
$ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-kmod
$
$ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-stable-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
$ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-stable-kmod
$
$ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-next-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
gpu-firmware-kmod
$ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-next-kmod
drm-kmod
drm-kmod
$
– is there _truly_ intended to be some dependency between drm-next-kmod and
drm-kmod?
Hi!
The version of drm-*-kmod that's pulled in is dependent on your FreeBSD
version. The dependenvy shown on FreshPorts is probably based on the
version of FreeBSD FreshPorts is using to parse the ports tree.
gpu-firmware-kmod is a dependency of all drm-*-kmod ports, but it's not
a direct dependency of drm-kmod.
Regards
--
Niclas Zeising
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
