On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 11:27, Kyle Evans <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 09:46:39PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: >> >> >> >> He now gets a little further, but ends up with the same panic due to >> >> efirtc_probe trying to get time to verify the rtc's actually >> >> implemented. What kind of approach must we take to ensure curcpu is >> >> synced? >> > >> > It does not panic for me, when I load efirt.ko from the loader prompt. >> > Anyway, try this >> >> Right, I also don't get a panic on any of my machines from this. >> Hopefully he'll have a chance to try this soon. > > This change has no impact: it still panics in the same way as without the > patch. >
That seems indicative of a bigger problem, since we use proc0 throughout all these bits so we should still be dealing with the same pmap that got passed to pmap_pinit0 when we grab curthread->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
