On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 01:38:07PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote:
> It turns out ck already has equivalent primitives. Pardon the noise.
Why not to add trivial cmpset-based implementations to the lacking
arches ?  If maintainers prefer proper ll/cs assembly, they would
have the time to do it properly without ultimatum.

It is useful to utilize consistent atomic(9) KPI across kernel.

> 
> -M
> 
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:18 Matthew Macy <mm...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > The functions in the subject are both documented in atomic(9) and are
> > implemented by every arch except sparc64 and MIPS. I have some code in
> > review that uses them that I intend to commit once the various design
> > issues are addressed. Please implement them so that those targets can
> > remain part of universe.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> > -M
> >
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to