On Mon, 21 May 2018 10:07:28 -0700 Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> Why? "If it isn't broken, why fix it?" > > The conflict affects x86_64-*-freebsd aka amd64. The > conflict does not affect any other architecture. The > Makefile infrastructure can use MACHINE_ARCH to exclude > drm2 from build of amd64. > > I don't use netgraph or any of the if_*.ko modules. > Can we put all of that into ports? I don't use any > scsi controllers, so those can go too. Why make it > insanely fun for users to configure a FreeBSD system. > I just ask. Or why not include drm-next to base svn repo and add some option to make.conf to swith drm2/dem-next ? _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
