On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 04:55:13PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 16:28:55 +0300 Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 03:15:00PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> Thanks for the review. There's just one concern I have. With this patch > >> the bufspace_daemon threads appear to shutdown after the buf_daemon and > >> after the syncer because the event handlers are registered later. Are > >> there any dependencies between these processes that require the bufspace > >> threads to be stopped earlier? > > > > I think for correctness bufdaemon must stop after the syncer, since syncer > > operation can cause a situation where bufdaemon help is needed to proceed. > > Other than this, the stop order is irrelevant, because after syncer > > finished, there should be no any further filesystem activity. > > A quick way to do that would be to use SHUTDOWN_PRI_LAST + 100 for the > event handlers in the patch, like shutdown_conf in kern_shutdown.c > already does. Is that acceptable here as well?
I do not see why not. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
