> Le 20/02/2018 ? 22:45, Kyle Evans a ?crit?: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Juan Ram?n Molina Menor <lis...@club.fr> > > wrote: > >> [... snip ...] > >> > >> Moreover, the "boot [kernel]" loader command does not work: > >> > >> OK ls /boot/kernel.old/kernel > >> /boot/kernel.old/kernel > >> OK boot kernel.old > >> Command failed > >> OK boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel > >> Command failed > >> OK boot kernel > >> Command failed > >> > >> On the other hand, just "boot" works. > >> > > > > This part should work as expected as of r329674, so please give that a > > shot. I'm still trying to see if I can reproduce your box drawing > > problem. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kyle Evans > > > > Thanks Kyle. > > boot command works now. There is though a somewhat strangely formulated > messages when trying to load an non-existent kernel: > > OK boot fake > Failed to load kernel ?fake? > Failed to load any kernel > can?t load ?kernel? > > The two last lines are odd: Did the loader try to load a fallback kernel > and failed? That would explain the ?kernel? name in quotes, but I have > such a kernel? Also, just nitpicking, but "can?t" should be capitalized.
To be supper nt picky can't should also be spelled can not. > Then, I have just remembered why I was seeing a higher resolution menu > before: I had set 'gop set 0' in /boot/loader.rc.local. It seems the new > loader is not implementing the inclusion of this file, because I can > change the gop mode in the loader with 'gop set [0-3]'. > > This has thus nothing to do with the drawing lines, I guess. > > Best regards. -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
