On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:52:33 +0100 Andreas Tobler <andreast-l...@fgznet.ch> wrote: > On 31.10.17 22:36, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> Those possibly still stuck on obsolete versions of FreeBSD don't >> need/want fancy new compilers and GCC 4.9 is still available for >> use and does not exhibit this issue, correct? (If it does, nobody >> reported any problems.) > > It is limited to gcc >=5, gcc-4.9 does not have the > MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR defined. > >>> I can 'ifdef' the new code and in the 'else' case we fall back to >>> the already existing path. >> >> If it's "cheap", that might be nice. > > Attached, the test is running on gcc trunk and gcc-6. gcc-6 is the last > one with java support and there we have quite extensive test cases which > really test for this MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR macro. These test > cases, Throw_2 and co do pass. So I think the new bits should be fine. > Also some coming asan test cases do pass with this addition too.
Please commit it to the ports tree as well, because there are reports that ftp/curl can trigger the problem. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
