On Tue, Jun 20, 2000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Watching my machine boot, the parallel nature of this fsck is now
> > confusing the output, eg:
> >
> > Automatic reboot in progress...
> > ** /dev/ad0s1a
> > ** Last Mounted on /
> > ** Root file system
> > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
> > de0: enabling 10baseT port
> > ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
> > ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
> > ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
> > ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
> > 1506 files, 57594 used, 10837 free (285 frags, 1319 blocks, 0.4% fragmentation)
> > ** /dev/amrd0a
> > ** /dev/ad0s1f
> > ** Last Mounted on /cache
> > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
> > ** Last Mounted on /usr
> > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
> > ...
>
> > Would people object to fsck printing out either the mountpoint or the
> > devname (where appropriate) prepending each line of fsck_ffs ?
>
> Yes, if it is down for anything except the parallel (preen) case.
>
> How did you get all the above output? The current fsck doesn't print
> any "Phase" messages for the preen case. When these messages are
> printed, interactive input is required except in the -y case, so the
> processes can't be run in parallel.
A couple of oversights when I did the code merging. They've been fixed,
and I'll throw up a new copy of the source code at the same URL in about
an hour.
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd Build a man a fire, and he's warm for the
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rest of the evening. Set a man on fire and
he's warm for the rest of his life.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
