On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:51:18PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:03:49PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > So my opinion did not changed, this sounds like firmware problem.
> > I do not see how can I drill into it more.
>
> I am don't know how it related. msgbufp mapped different with and w/o
> memory test:
>
> w/o memory test, hang:
> msgbufp=0xfffff8207ff00000 pa_indx=7 phys_avail[pa_indx]=207ff00000
>
> w/ memory test, boot:
> msgbufp=0xfffff8203ff00000 pa_indx=7 phys_avail[pa_indx]=203ff00000
Interesting.
Can you show me
- the output of the smap command from the loader (yes, I know it was already
shown, I want it in the same mail as the data below for convenience);
- the output of sysctl machdep.smap after the succesfull boot with the
memtest enabled.
Possibly, the dmesg of the boot (with late_console=0) with this and only
this patch applied against stock HEAD. This might be long.
diff --git a/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c b/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c
index 682307f5fe4..072c8d76acf 100644
--- a/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c
+++ b/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c
@@ -1400,6 +1400,7 @@ getmemsize(caddr_t kmdp, u_int64_t first)
*/
*(int *)ptr = tmp;
+if (page_bad) printf("pb 0x%lx\n", pa);
skip_memtest:
/*
* Adjust array of valid/good pages.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
