> On 10 Oct 2016, at 20:27, Matthias Apitz <g...@unixarea.de> wrote: > >> El día Monday, October 10, 2016 a las 09:26:26AM -0600, Warner Losh escribió: >> >> I see no reason not to start the table right away based on >> smbios.sys.product and other criteria. I don't think we need all the >> matches that Linux uses, but we can expand the table if we find it so. >> Why have a stop gap that's a table that we kludge together when the >> real table is of comparable difficulty and wouldn't need to be >> reworked. > > Please let us together concentrate on getting other i2c devices working, > like the Elan TouchPad, because I fear that newer Chromebooks are all > equipped with this and not with the Cyapa anymore. >
I see three tasks here: - Andriy finishes his change, moving things from smbus to iicbus, adding some workaround to keep the user experience like it is - Someone else implements the device table mechanism for auto detection - Someone else ports HDI over I2C to allow implementing drivers for devices like the elan touchpad Matthias is referring to Makes sense? -m _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
