On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:27:52AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Again, the point is that those objecting should put aside the time to
> implement what you (and I) are suggesting:
>
> > I could live with:
> >
> > base-utils 11.1
> > - ktrace uninstalled
> > - tcpdump uninstalled
> > + dd 11.1.1 (CVE-123412 fix)
> >
> >
> >
> > but not
> > {700 packages )
> > dd 11.1.1 dd with CVE fix
> > {29 more packages}
> > [tcpdump line is not present but you don't notice that]
> > {10 more packages}
> > [ktrace line would be here but you don't notice that either]
> > {15 more packages}
>
> What should not happen is that this incremental step forward be blocked
> by those unwilling to hash out the next steps.
Teoretical.
In practical this is happen with me.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
