On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:40:37AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > Don't cc me. I looked at the in-tree dtc code once and decided it's > too flawed to try to maintain, and it supports only a subset of the > full dts syntax. That's why we switched back to using the gnu dtc for > buildkernel. But I just discovered that for some reason gnu is not the > copy of dtc that gets installed, it's just the one that gets used > during a buildkernel. > > So basically if you do 'dtc -v' and the result is 0.4.0, that's too > limited to compile modern dts files, and if the result is 1.4.0 that's > the gnu dtc that should work fine, and if it doesn't we probably need > to report the problem upstream. > > -- Ian >
Thanks Ian, The GPL dtc worked fine. I was actually wanting to compiler the in-tree zedbaord.dts file. I'd successfully done it some time back in June but must have been using the GPL dtc without realising it. George. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
