On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:18:00AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 08/23/15 18:36, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c > > =================================================================== > > > > > - --- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (revision 287087) > > +++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (working copy) @@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ > > em_setup_interface(device_t dev, struct adapter *a > > if_setioctlfn(ifp, em_ioctl); if_setgetcounterfn(ifp, > > em_get_counter); /* TSO parameters */ - ifp->if_hw_tsomax = > > EM_TSO_SIZE; + ifp->if_hw_tsomax = IP_MAXPACKET; > > ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegcount = EM_MAX_SCATTER; > > ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegsize = EM_TSO_SEG_SIZE; > > > Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first > place. What's the scenario that seems to work here? NFS seems happy > with/without the patch so I'm not confident in anything we are doing her > e.
I see several patches here. Which one should I be using? -- Joel _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
