On Tue, 9 May 2000, David O'Brien wrote: >On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 06:30:17PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: >> Actually, it has to do with the pkg_ commands, which I believe are built >> when you make world... > >yes. > >> and aren't part of the ports, > >And are only used for Ports. Thus their behavior defines the behavior of >the Ports Collection. Thus it is a Ports issue. IF the pkg_* utils were >ports, how would you install them?? > >-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Am I missing something? I thought ports only need some .mk files and make? (Along with tools to get those there, including the port itself, at most fetch or ftp, and tar?) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- a better idea for package dependencies Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies Kris Kennaway
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package dependenci... Adam
- Re: a better idea for package depend... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package d... Garrett Wollman
- Re: a better idea for packa... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package d... Adam
- Re: a better idea for packa... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for p... Adam
- Re: a better idea for p... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package d... Nik Clayton
- Re: a better idea for package dependenci... Chuck Robey