:Because if we do not provide a STABLE ABI, we WON'T get third-party
:(binary only) kernel modules.
:
:I'm very divided in this issue. 4.x has just started, and would be
:seriously impaired if no further improvements to it's SMP get in. On
:the other hand, if we can't garantee third party vendors a stable ABI,
:we won't get third party vendors.
:
:Alas... Dillon, how much of SMP improvements will be getting back-ported
:without further breaks in ABI, specially as BSDI code starts to trickle
:in?
:
:--
:Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
Most of the SMP innards are invisible to the user and even invisible
(for the most part) to KLD's. For example, making the VM subsystem and
network stack MP-safe can probably be done without any external
visibility.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- RE: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compat... Alok Dhir
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module c... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object modu... Matthew Dillon
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object modu... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object ... Vallo Kallaste
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld obj... Christopher Nielsen
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kl... Vallo Kallaste
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object ... Paul Richards
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kld obj... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: SMP changes and breaking kl... Wilko Bulte
- Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP cha... Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re:... Wilko Bulte
- Re: Patchkits: Was :Re:... Garrett Wollman
