In message <[email protected]>, Joe Holden writes: >On 24/02/2014 04:26, Julio Merino wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <[email protected]>wrote:
>>> As some of you may have noticed, I have imorted a couple of days ago dma >>> (DragonFly Mail Agent) in base. I have been asked to explain my motivation >>> so here they are. >> I'd argue, for example, that postfix can be also easily configured and can >> be made to not listen on port 25 for local mail delivery, while at the same >> time it is a fully-functional MTA that could replace sendmail altogether. >The trend towards having sensible lightweight things in the base is a >good thing IMO. Fully agree. To the extent we can manage it, we should have minimal client-focused tools for things like DNS, SMTP and NTP in the tree and make it trivial for people to install the fully featured server version of their choice from ports. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
