On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found >>> anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard >>> options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with: >>> >>> env LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc++.so.1 octave >>> >>> Some very light testing indicates that it is working. Of course, this is >>> not ideal. >>> >>> Maybe this gives a clue how to fix the octave port properly. >> >> I have a preliminary patch for math/octave that I wanted to test on >> redports first, but it is down at the moment so here it is. > > The tests were successful: > https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201105316-94935/ (octave) > https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201115701-22333/ (octave-forge-base) > The octave logs also contain the results of running the regression-test > target. The output is the same on all FreeBSD versions. > > The problem is that USE_FORTRAN=yes implies USE_GCC=yes. This means > the C++ code in math/octave is compiled with gcc46/libstdc++ which > does not work if dependencies have been built with clang/libc++. > > The patch copies the USE_FORTRAN=yes logic from Mk/bsd.gcc.mk into a > new file Mk/Uses/fortran.mk. It allows ports to use a Fortran compiler > together with the base system C/C++ compiler.
This is nice! Cheers, Antoine _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
