I am not top posting. Do not accuse me of this. I am upset and depressed and I do not need you to accuse me of something I am not doing. My system is shitting out on me. I have already told you what is happening. Stop accusing me of something I am not doing.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Steve Kargl < s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > Please, do not top post. It loses context. > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 04:05:27PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Steve Kargl < > > s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > > Is the ALPHA base stable enough to do porting of applications? > > > > > > > > > > Huh? What do you mean? People have been running freebsd-current > > > for years and porting applications to FreeBSD. Alpha is simply > > > a point in time for freebsd-current. > > > > I was rebuilding world using an older CURRENT base and the src from > > 10/07/13. The build kept breaking with libiconv, msun, and a few others. > > The problem you had with msun was caused by you adding additional options > to CFLAGS in make.conf without actually understand what those options may > do. > > > This affected both the base and 3rd party. The system is still usable but > > it isn't stable enough for building a 3rd party application. > > Yes, it is stable enough. Remove your custom CFLAG options. > > > If I reinstall the base with CURRENT from 10/07/13 to present, will > > it be stable enough for building 3rd party? > > Of course. But, you need to read src/UPDATING and ports/UPDATING. > > -- > Steve > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
