On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org> wrote:

> I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion
> involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it
> showed up in some of the messages there.

I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this case) *needs* to be 
removed.

What, in the current builds of 10.x, is broken by leaving RCS/CVS in place?  
And what, as 10.x moves forward towards a public release, will be broken by 
leaving this code in the base?

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to