On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org> wrote: > I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion > involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it > showed up in some of the messages there.
I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this case) *needs* to be removed. What, in the current builds of 10.x, is broken by leaving RCS/CVS in place? And what, as 10.x moves forward towards a public release, will be broken by leaving this code in the base? _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"